The Pennsylvania tri-co (Swarthmore-Haverford-Bryn Mawr) have a very active LGBT community, particularly considering their size.
As a transsexual, among the reasons Swarthmore clicked beside me had been the accessibility to gender-neutral housing and its particular many queer groups.
“can you instead be at a college with 1,000 individuals where 10% of pupils are homosexual or at a college with 25,000 where 5% associated with pupils are homosexual? Given that gay individuals tend to cluster together, you might be better off in the larger college.”
It was undoubtedly my logic whenever I put on schools, but after being a pupil for four years at one particular 30K students school (which made com that is autostraddle list of many lesbian-friendly universities, as well), i could unequivocally state that the logic is much more flawed compared to the OP’s, unfortuitously. Gay individuals try not to “group together” by itself. while you will have a specific subset that is greatly active in the Pride Alliance, other activist pupil groups, etc., there is a lot of gay individuals who aren’t into conventional homosexual activities/grouping. At an university that is large you may be definitely completely not likely to meet up those 1,250 gays and lesbians. when you look at the way that is same associated with right populace is lost you at a big state uni, a lot of the homosexual populace is “absorbed” to the public aswell. I would personally say my buddies at ladies’ universities understand somewhat more queer individuals than i actually do. though their schools are smaller by in regards to a 100x. Though, i am incredibly pleased with the proven fact that it’s just “slightly”. Get Terps .
Having said that, you’ve got a place that likely to an exceptionally little uni with a somewhat low percentage of queer individuals is very much indeed even even even worse than planning to an university that is large a somewhat reduced percentage.